<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Shatter Nicely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shatternicely.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shatternicely.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on religion, politics, and life, from a former evangelical Christian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:23:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Do a Home Soapmaker and Unilever Have in Common? by Charity</title>
		<link>http://shatternicely.com/2010/07/what-do-a-home-soapmaker-and-unilever-have-in-common/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatternicely.com/?p=751#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Gotta love that corporate sponsored government!
Thanks for signing the petition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love that corporate sponsored government!<br />
Thanks for signing the petition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Do a Home Soapmaker and Unilever Have in Common? by Peter Buknatski</title>
		<link>http://shatternicely.com/2010/07/what-do-a-home-soapmaker-and-unilever-have-in-common/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Buknatski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatternicely.com/?p=751#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Charity.  Federal &#039;safety&#039; regulations have put a lot of small farmers, sugarers, etc. out of business.  Ain&#039;t it neat how the &#039;big boys&#039; are so concerned about our safety.  &#039;Cept when it comes to drilling for oil.  (&quot;Hey, it ain&#039;t &#039;safe&#039; down there, you assholes!  There&#039;s methane!&quot;  &quot;So...?&quot; they reply)  Signed the petition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Charity.  Federal &#8216;safety&#8217; regulations have put a lot of small farmers, sugarers, etc. out of business.  Ain&#8217;t it neat how the &#8216;big boys&#8217; are so concerned about our safety.  &#8216;Cept when it comes to drilling for oil.  (&#8220;Hey, it ain&#8217;t &#8216;safe&#8217; down there, you assholes!  There&#8217;s methane!&#8221;  &#8220;So&#8230;?&#8221; they reply)  Signed the petition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Penn Jillette on the Tea Party, Bush and Obama by JD Ryan</title>
		<link>http://shatternicely.com/2010/06/penn-jillette-on-the-tea-party-bush-and-obama/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>JD Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatternicely.com/?p=732#comment-396</guid>
		<description>As to his defense of the Tea Party re: racism, that&#039;s utter bullshit. This &quot;unless racism is explicitly stated&quot; horseshit sounds more like something Chanman would say in the midst of one of his racist posts. No, racism isn&#039;t the only factor with the teabaggers, ignorance and intellectual inconsistency are the biggest ones, but it&#039;s a major factot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to his defense of the Tea Party re: racism, that&#8217;s utter bullshit. This &#8220;unless racism is explicitly stated&#8221; horseshit sounds more like something Chanman would say in the midst of one of his racist posts. No, racism isn&#8217;t the only factor with the teabaggers, ignorance and intellectual inconsistency are the biggest ones, but it&#8217;s a major factot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Penn Jillette on the Tea Party, Bush and Obama by JD Ryan</title>
		<link>http://shatternicely.com/2010/06/penn-jillette-on-the-tea-party-bush-and-obama/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>JD Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatternicely.com/?p=732#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Not necessarily disagreeing with Jillette here, but he (and Teller) are Cato Institute libertarians, holding some pretty unliberal positions on some things. That hasn&#039;t stopped me from watching all 7 seasons of their show Bullshit!, which I highly recommend, even though I don&#039;t agree with all of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not necessarily disagreeing with Jillette here, but he (and Teller) are Cato Institute libertarians, holding some pretty unliberal positions on some things. That hasn&#8217;t stopped me from watching all 7 seasons of their show Bullshit!, which I highly recommend, even though I don&#8217;t agree with all of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Penn Jillette on the Tea Party, Bush and Obama by Peter Buknatski</title>
		<link>http://shatternicely.com/2010/06/penn-jillette-on-the-tea-party-bush-and-obama/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Buknatski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatternicely.com/?p=732#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Good one.  Obama is Bush/Cheney with a smiley face.  People who &#039;say it isn&#039;t so&#039; are dim dim bulbs.  Well, at least we know Michelle will set the fashion for us in what to wear when it starts raining oil.   

I wonder sometimes whether anyone on the Left has considered the notion that Obama was &#039;picked&#039; by the Corporate Boys as a President who cannot be criticized in the inflammatory way Bush was simply because he&#039;s President Nice.

Well, here:  President Oilslick.  That&#039;s racist, you see.  President Doorman (&quot;Come on in, Corporate Boys, and raid the Treasury!&quot;)  Racist.  Who says CEOs are dumb?

President Do Nothing...perhaps he should run for Governor of Vermont?  

We&#039;ve been had.  Either that, or the Liberal Left is saying:  &quot;We really really really miss Bush.&quot;

Thank you again, Charity.  You should cross-post this on GMD just for fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one.  Obama is Bush/Cheney with a smiley face.  People who &#8216;say it isn&#8217;t so&#8217; are dim dim bulbs.  Well, at least we know Michelle will set the fashion for us in what to wear when it starts raining oil.   </p>
<p>I wonder sometimes whether anyone on the Left has considered the notion that Obama was &#8216;picked&#8217; by the Corporate Boys as a President who cannot be criticized in the inflammatory way Bush was simply because he&#8217;s President Nice.</p>
<p>Well, here:  President Oilslick.  That&#8217;s racist, you see.  President Doorman (&#8220;Come on in, Corporate Boys, and raid the Treasury!&#8221;)  Racist.  Who says CEOs are dumb?</p>
<p>President Do Nothing&#8230;perhaps he should run for Governor of Vermont?  </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been had.  Either that, or the Liberal Left is saying:  &#8220;We really really really miss Bush.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thank you again, Charity.  You should cross-post this on GMD just for fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not Happy About Happy Town by Bob</title>
		<link>http://shatternicely.com/2010/06/not-happy-about-happy-town/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatternicely.com/?p=671#comment-384</guid>
		<description>You should ask the singer of Heart who the Magic Man is.
She was getting down with him back in the 70s!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should ask the singer of Heart who the Magic Man is.<br />
She was getting down with him back in the 70s!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Power of&#8230; Thinking You Are Talking to Someone by Nancy</title>
		<link>http://shatternicely.com/2010/06/the-power-of-thinking-you-are-talking-to-someone/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatternicely.com/?p=649#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Hi Charity,

Yes, that would be great if you&#039;d still email me.

Your description of 5 years of &quot;emotionless&quot; faith makes me sad. Did you get negative reactions from your church when you tried to express things, or were you just trying to imitate what you were seeing as the norm?

Whatever the reason, you&#039;re right in finding it to be warped. It&#039;s just that this warped practice has nothing to do with my experience of Christianity.

Look forward to hearing from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charity,</p>
<p>Yes, that would be great if you&#8217;d still email me.</p>
<p>Your description of 5 years of &#8220;emotionless&#8221; faith makes me sad. Did you get negative reactions from your church when you tried to express things, or were you just trying to imitate what you were seeing as the norm?</p>
<p>Whatever the reason, you&#8217;re right in finding it to be warped. It&#8217;s just that this warped practice has nothing to do with my experience of Christianity.</p>
<p>Look forward to hearing from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Power of&#8230; Thinking You Are Talking to Someone by Charity</title>
		<link>http://shatternicely.com/2010/06/the-power-of-thinking-you-are-talking-to-someone/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 16:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatternicely.com/?p=649#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Hi Nancy,

I was just thinking about the fact that I never replied to your last e-mail.  Things have been a little hectic lately, but I will have some time this weekend.

My faith was not emotion-based.  In fact, just the opposite, I was taught that one of the great things about God was that he is permanent and reliable, unlike our emotions, which change based on the situation and are not reliable.

I talk about things from an emotional perspective because I spent the past 5 years &lt;i&gt;denying&lt;/i&gt; my emotions!  I pushed them down and buried them because I needed to stop being so selfish, how can I complain about my life&#039;s trials after the sacrifice Jesus made for me, blah, blah, blah.

It&#039;s not good to keep things in.

And it&#039;s okay to want to feel good.

Not that I expect to always feel good, nor do I base my decisions on my emotions because they &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; temporary.  But, they are still important to take care of.

I know that Christianity is not supposed to solve all your problems and make you happy, but there does come a time where one stops and asks, why am I doing this if it is consistently making me miserable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nancy,</p>
<p>I was just thinking about the fact that I never replied to your last e-mail.  Things have been a little hectic lately, but I will have some time this weekend.</p>
<p>My faith was not emotion-based.  In fact, just the opposite, I was taught that one of the great things about God was that he is permanent and reliable, unlike our emotions, which change based on the situation and are not reliable.</p>
<p>I talk about things from an emotional perspective because I spent the past 5 years <i>denying</i> my emotions!  I pushed them down and buried them because I needed to stop being so selfish, how can I complain about my life&#8217;s trials after the sacrifice Jesus made for me, blah, blah, blah.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not good to keep things in.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s okay to want to feel good.</p>
<p>Not that I expect to always feel good, nor do I base my decisions on my emotions because they <i>are</i> temporary.  But, they are still important to take care of.</p>
<p>I know that Christianity is not supposed to solve all your problems and make you happy, but there does come a time where one stops and asks, why am I doing this if it is consistently making me miserable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Power of&#8230; Thinking You Are Talking to Someone by Nancy</title>
		<link>http://shatternicely.com/2010/06/the-power-of-thinking-you-are-talking-to-someone/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatternicely.com/?p=649#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Hi again Charity,

I&#039;m wondering whether part of your good feeling the other day had to do with your generous decision not to burden your husband after all with something he couldn&#039;t respond to anyway.

Then again, maybe you felt better because there was a good song on the radio.

I&#039;m surprised how much you have based your faith and your unfaith on feelings.

Perhaps you were fed a really thin theology [I have a feeling that you were :)  ]

Anyway, I&#039;d love to continue the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again Charity,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering whether part of your good feeling the other day had to do with your generous decision not to burden your husband after all with something he couldn&#8217;t respond to anyway.</p>
<p>Then again, maybe you felt better because there was a good song on the radio.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised how much you have based your faith and your unfaith on feelings.</p>
<p>Perhaps you were fed a really thin theology [I have a feeling that you were <img src='http://shatternicely.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   ]</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;d love to continue the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Atheism a Religion? by Charity</title>
		<link>http://shatternicely.com/2010/05/is-atheism-a-religion/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 16:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatternicely.com/?p=619#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Bill,

I&#039;m not sure why you are so focused on the one sentence about being an atheist when I was born.  That was but one piece of my life&#039;s time line.

My point was that I never had a specific set of beliefs.  To consider something a religion, it requires a specific set of beliefs.  I never had that until I became a Christian.

Having rejected that set of beliefs, I have returned to my previous state of having no set of beliefs.

Yes, there are things I believe about life.  I believe that the sun will not burn out.  I believe that the mail will be delivered, except for Sundays and holidays.  I believe that it is worthwhile to be nice to people, even though that doesn&#039;t guarantee that they will be nice back.

But, I do not have &lt;i&gt;religious&lt;/i&gt; beliefs.

If you want to talk dictionary definitions, Merriam-Webster online defines religious as: &lt;i&gt;relating to or manifesting faithful devotion to an acknowledged ultimate reality or deity&lt;/i&gt;.

I do not have any such faithful devotion.  I have no idea about the ultimate reality.  I do not insist there is no deity.

I rejected the only religious beliefs I ever had, leaving me with none once again.

There are some atheists who do have a faithful devotion to their beliefs of the ultimate reality.  I admit, those atheists could be considered to have a religion.  But that does not make atheism itself a religion.

I do not have it all figured out.  I don&#039;t think I ever will, especially since I don&#039;t much care to try and figure it all out.

Living is hard enough.  Finding happiness and fulfillment, taking care of responsibilities, and fostering personal relationships are all enough work, without spending my time trying to figure out ultimate reality in a way that I am sure enough of to faithfully devote myself to it.

I personally do not believe in god, but I am not making any claims about what the ultimate reality is.  I find it a stretch to call that a religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why you are so focused on the one sentence about being an atheist when I was born.  That was but one piece of my life&#8217;s time line.</p>
<p>My point was that I never had a specific set of beliefs.  To consider something a religion, it requires a specific set of beliefs.  I never had that until I became a Christian.</p>
<p>Having rejected that set of beliefs, I have returned to my previous state of having no set of beliefs.</p>
<p>Yes, there are things I believe about life.  I believe that the sun will not burn out.  I believe that the mail will be delivered, except for Sundays and holidays.  I believe that it is worthwhile to be nice to people, even though that doesn&#8217;t guarantee that they will be nice back.</p>
<p>But, I do not have <i>religious</i> beliefs.</p>
<p>If you want to talk dictionary definitions, Merriam-Webster online defines religious as: <i>relating to or manifesting faithful devotion to an acknowledged ultimate reality or deity</i>.</p>
<p>I do not have any such faithful devotion.  I have no idea about the ultimate reality.  I do not insist there is no deity.</p>
<p>I rejected the only religious beliefs I ever had, leaving me with none once again.</p>
<p>There are some atheists who do have a faithful devotion to their beliefs of the ultimate reality.  I admit, those atheists could be considered to have a religion.  But that does not make atheism itself a religion.</p>
<p>I do not have it all figured out.  I don&#8217;t think I ever will, especially since I don&#8217;t much care to try and figure it all out.</p>
<p>Living is hard enough.  Finding happiness and fulfillment, taking care of responsibilities, and fostering personal relationships are all enough work, without spending my time trying to figure out ultimate reality in a way that I am sure enough of to faithfully devote myself to it.</p>
<p>I personally do not believe in god, but I am not making any claims about what the ultimate reality is.  I find it a stretch to call that a religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
